39/22 Composition of the staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights - Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

GE.18-10855(E)



Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session

10–28 September 2018

Agenda item 2

Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner

for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the

High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

Composition of the staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights*

* The annexes to the present report are reproduced as received, in the language of submission only.

United Nations A/HRC/39/22

I. Introduction

1. The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 36/1, requested the United Nations

High Commissioner for Human Rights to submit a report to the Council at its thirty-ninth

session on the geographical composition of the staff of the Office of the United High

Commissioner (OHCHR) and the actions taken within the current staff selection system to

achieve an equitable geographical representation of the Office.

2. Chapter II of the present report includes data on staff members in regular budget

posts subject to geographical distribution, and data on staff in temporary posts funded from

general temporary assistance and extrabudgetary resources, or in technical cooperation

project posts, neither of which are included in the definition of posts subject to geographical

distribution.

3. Chapter III contains a description of the measures for improvement taken by the

High Commissioner under the staff selection systems in force in 2017 (ST/AI/2010/3,

ST/AI/2010/3/Amend.1, ST/AI/2010/3/Amend.2, ST/AI/2010/3/Amend.3, ST/AI/2016/1,

ST/AI/2016/1/Amend.1 and ST/SGB/2016/2/Rev.1).

II. Composition of the staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

4. The recruitment of staff members to posts subject to geographical distribution is

governed by the system of desirable ranges at the Secretariat level. For that purpose,

Member States are grouped into four categories: unrepresented, underrepresented, within

range and overrepresented. A Member State is considered unrepresented when none of its

nationals, throughout the entire Secretariat, is serving in a post subject to geographical

distribution and filled in accordance with the established selection process. It is

underrepresented when the number of its nationals appointed to such posts throughout the

entire Secretariat is below the lower limit of the desirable range. It is within range when the

number of its nationals appointed to such posts is between the upper and lower limits of the

desirable range, and it is overrepresented when the number of its nationals appointed to

such posts within the entire Secretariat exceeds the upper limit of the desirable range. The

representation status of Member States is affected by many factors, in particular the

turnover of staff and changes in the scale of assessments. OHCHR is the Secretariat entity

with the largest number of staff with geographical status.1

5. The official report on the composition of the Secretariat is submitted annually by the

Secretary-General to the General Assembly in accordance with a number of resolutions, the

most recent being Assembly resolutions 65/247, 66/234, 67/255, 68/252, 72/254 and

71/263.

6. The most recent report of the Secretary-General on the composition of the

Secretariat (A/72/123) covers the period from 1 July to 31 December 2016. OHCHR is part

of the Secretariat and the breakdown of its geographical composition has to be seen against

the breakdown of overall distribution within the Secretariat.

7. In August 2011, the Office of Human Resources Management launched an online

reporting tool, “HR Insight”, which is available to all permanent missions. Since then, staff

demographic information has been available to all permanent missions. The tool is based on

the human resources data warehouse and enables the retrieval of information from other

human resources systems, including the Integrated Management Information System and

Umoja.

8. Through HR Insight, Member States have regular access to information similar to

that presented in the report of the Secretary-General on the composition of the Secretariat.

HR Insight presents the information mainly at the staff member level, while the report of

1 See A/72/123, table 23.

the Secretary-General presents the information at the aggregated level and is produced only

annually. The United Nations staff information available to Member States on HR Insight

includes: (a) General Assembly report; (b) Staff list; (c) Desirable range status; (d)

Desirable range comparison; (e) All staff details; (f) Staff details; (g) Staff analysis; (h)

Forecast retirements; (i) Forecast retirements (senior staff); (j) Staffing matrix; (k) Senior

staff; (l) Senior staff (count).

9. The Office of Human Resources Management will continue to enhance the

information available online, thereby giving Member States convenient and monthly access

to staff demographic information that was previously available only in the annual report.2

10. The table in annex I provides a breakdown of all OHCHR staff members in the

Professional category and above who have been selected through the established

recruitment process (“regular” staff) against both regular budget posts subject to

geographical distribution and extrabudgetary posts, by nationality, grade and sex as at 31

December 2017.

11. The table in annex II provides a breakdown of the following categories of additional

OHCHR staff in the Professional category and above not included in the table in annex I,

also by nationality, grade and sex as at 31 December 2017:

(a) Staff holding appointments of less than one year;

(b) Staff charged to general temporary assistance funds;

(c) Staff employed as technical cooperation project personnel.

12. It should be recalled that, in section IX, paragraph 14, of its resolution 63/250, the

General Assembly re-emphasized that the system of geographical ranges was designed to

apply to countries rather than to regions or groups. The data in the present report are

therefore provided by country and listed in alphabetical order.

13. As at 31 December 2017, OHCHR had a total of 731 staff members in the

Professional category and above, of whom 561 are considered regular staff.

14. Nationals from 113 countries are represented in the Professional and above

workforce, in both geographical and non-geographical posts. The latter comprise

extrabudgetary posts that are not included under the system of desirable ranges (see para. 4

above). Of those 113 nationalities, 15 are underrepresented, 3 72 are considered within

range,4 while 26 nationalities are overrepresented in the Secretariat. 5 OHCHR also has

nationals from the State of Palestine on its staff and one stateless staff member.

2 See A/72/123, paras. 6–8.

3 Underrepresented at 31 December 2017: Afghanistan, Belarus, Brazil, Central African Republic,

China, Cyprus, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Japan, Lesotho, Norway, Republic of Korea, Russian

Federation, Syrian Arab Republic, United States of America and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of).

4 Within range at 31 December 2017: Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia

(Plurinational State of), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Burundi, Chad, Colombia, Congo, Costa

Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Czechia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, El Salvador,

Eritrea, Estonia, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, India, Iraq,

Israel, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali,

Mauritania, Mauritius, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland,

Republic of Moldova, Romania, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Sri

Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Tonga,

Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Yemen.

5 Overrepresented at 31 December 2017: Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada,

Chile, Denmark, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Mexico,

Netherlands, Philippines, Portugal, Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, United Kingdom of Great

Britain and Northern Ireland and Uruguay.

III. Efforts made to achieve equitable geographical representation and gender balance, and the Secretariat staff selection systems

15. Enhancing the geographical diversity of OHCHR staff remains one of the High

Commissioner’s priorities. However, during 2016 and 2017, he had no authority to select

the candidates he considered best suited for almost 90 per cent of OHCHR regular

positions, as these positions were part of the Political, Peace and Humanitarian Network,

and, as of 2017, of the Information and Telecommunication Technology Network.

Selections for such positions were coordinated centrally through the Office of Human

Resources Management (ST/AI/2016/1 and ST/AI/2016/1/Amend.1). On 26 December

2017, the Secretary-General paused the centralized decision-making process and selections

for new posts in both networks, in order to comprehensively review the framework,

including lessons learned with regard to the centralized processes and their cost-

effectiveness in meeting the intended purposes (ST/SGB/2016/2/Rev.1). During this pause,

the staff selection system governed by administrative instruction ST/AI/2010/3 and the

amendments thereto became applicable for the Political, Peace and Humanitarian Network

and the Information and Telecommunication Technology Network, and would continue to

apply to all job networks that had not made the transition to the new system.

16. During 2017, therefore, all placement and recruitment decisions in the Political,

Peace and Humanitarian Network and the Information and Telecommunication Technology

Network were made in the interests of the Organization as a whole by the Assistant

Secretary-General for Human Resources Management and the Secretary-General, in

accordance with the goals and obligations placed upon them under the system of desirable

ranges mandated by the General Assembly. For OHCHR, this is reflected in the

departmental target relating to the recruitment of nationals from unrepresented and

underrepresented Member States established in the High Commissioner’s Compact. The

High Commissioner could indicate to the Assistant Secretary-General for Human

Resources Management what the human resources priorities were for OHCHR, but had no

final say in the selection process.

17. In addition to temporary job openings due to normal workforce fluctuations, the

implementation of the new system resulted in an increased number of temporary job

openings as an interim solution to ensure that work central to the mandate of OHCHR

continued. Notwithstanding instructions from the Under-Secretary-General for

Management to reduce costs by selecting candidates residing within the duty station, the

High Commissioner endeavoured to use the selection of temporary staff members to

increase the diversity of his Office.

18. OHCHR continues to pay special attention to the issue of balance between female

and male staff members at all levels, an area in which determination and concerted effort

have already brought success. As at 31 December 2017, women accounted for 61 per cent

of Professional staff at the P-1 to P-4 level and 37 per cent at the senior level (P-5 to D-2) at

OHCHR. OHCHR is fully committed to the Secretary-General’s system-wide strategy on

gender parity and has developed a gender parity action plan in line with that strategy.

IV. Conclusion

19. During the pause of the new staff selection and managed mobility system,

which applied to almost 90 per cent of OHCHR professional positions, the High

Commissioner will use his restored authority regarding the selection of staff for

vacant positions to renew his efforts to achieve the broadest possible geographical

diversity of his staff.

Annex I

Regular staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human

Rights in the Professional and higher categories, by nationality, grade and sex

(As at 31 December 2017)

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M

Afghanistan 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Albania 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Algeria 5 3 – – – – – – – – – 1 – – 2 1 1 – – –

Argentina 14 7 – – – – – – – – 2 – – 4 5 3 – – – –

Armenia 5 3 – – – – – – – – – – 2 – 1 2 – – – –

Australia 12 4 – – 1 – – – – 1 – 3 2 – 1 4 – – – –

Austria 7 5 – – – – – – – – – – 2 1 3 1 – – – –

Bangladesh 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – – –

Belgium 8 4 – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 2 – 2 1 – – –

Benin 4 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – 3 – – – –

Bolivia (Plurinational

State of) 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Botswana 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Brazil 7 4 – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 2 1 1 – – –

Bulgaria 6 3 – – – – – – – – – 2 – 1 3 – – – – –

Burundi 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – –

Cameroon 7 2 – – – – – – – – – – – 2 2 3 – – – –

Canada 18 11 – – – – 1 – – – 1 3 5 2 4 2 – – – –

Central African

Republic 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – – –

Chile 3 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 – – – –

China 4 4 – – – – – – – – – – 3 – – – 1 – – –

Colombia 8 6 – – – – – – – – 1 – 3 1 2 1 – – – –

Congo 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – – – –

Costa Rica 2 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – – – – – –

Côte d’Ivoire 5 2 – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 2 1 – – – –

Croatia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Cyprus 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Czechia 5 3 – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – 2 1 – – – –

Democratic Republic of

the Congo 5 3 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 1 1 – – –

Denmark 6 3 – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 2 1 – – – – –

Ecuador 5 4 – – – – – – – – – – 2 1 1 – 1 – – –

Egypt 3 – – – – – – – – 1 – – – 1 – 1 – – – –

El Salvador 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – –

Eritrea 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – 1 – – – –

Ethiopia 3 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 – – – –

Finland 5 3 – – – – – – – – 1 2 1 – – – 1 – – –

France 31 20 – – – – – – – 2 3 1 6 4 11 4 – – – –

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M

Germany 22 14 – – – – – – – – 3 2 5 2 6 4 – – – –

Ghana 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Guatemala 3 3 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 – – – – –

Guyana 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Haiti 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – 1 – –

India 8 5 – – – – – – – – 1 1 2 1 2 1 – – – –

Iran (Islamic Republic of) 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – – – –

Iraq 4 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 2 – – – –

Ireland 5 2 – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 2 – – – –

Israel 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Italy 34 18 – – – – – – – 1 3 5 11 6 2 4 2 – – –

Jamaica 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Japan 12 8 – – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 7 1 – 1 – –

Jordan 8 4 – 1 – – – – 1 – – 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – –

Kazakhstan 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Kenya 3 2 – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – 1 – – – – –

Kyrgyzstan 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Lebanon 3 2 – – – – – – – – 1 – – – 1 1 – – – –

Lesotho 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Lithuania 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Madagascar 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Malawi 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – –

Malaysia 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – – – – –

Maldives 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

Mali 3 1 – – – – – – – 1 – – 1 1 – – – – – –

Mauritania 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

Mauritius 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – – –

Mexico 10 7 – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 6 1 – 1 – –

Mongolia 3 1 – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – 1 – – – –

Nepal 6 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 2 1 3 – – – –

Netherlands 5 2 – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 1 – 1 – – – –

New Zealand 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Nigeria 6 4 – – – – – – – – 2 2 1 – 1 – – – – –

Norway 6 5 – – – – – – – – – – – – 3 – 2 1 – –

Panama 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Paraguay 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – –

Peru 4 1 – – – – – – – – – 2 1 – – 1 – – – –

Philippines 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Poland 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Portugal 6 4 – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 3 1 – – – –

Republic of Korea 8 7 – – – – – – – – 1 – – 1 3 – 3 – – –

Republic of Moldova 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – –

Romania 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Russian Federation 7 3 – – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 2 1 1 – – –

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M

Senegal 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

Serbia 4 3 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 1 – – – –

Singapore 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – – –

Slovenia 4 3 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 3 1 – –

South Africa 4 2 – – – – – – – – – – – 2 2 – – – – –

Spain 32 19 – – – – – – 1 1 2 1 2 4 11 6 3 1 – –

Sri Lanka 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Sudan 1 – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – – – – – – –

Sweden 8 6 – – – – – – – – – – 4 1 2 1 – – – –

Switzerland 20 15 – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 2 13 3 – – – –

The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Togo 3 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 – – – – – –

Tonga 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Trinidad and Tobago 2 1 – – – – – – 1 – – 1 – – – – – – – –

Tunisia 5 2 – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 2 – – – –

Turkey 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Uganda 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Ukraine 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

United Kingdom of

Great Britain and

Northern Ireland 28 13 – – – 1 – – – – 1 6 6 3 4 4 2 1 – –

United States of

America 29 15 – – – – 1 – – 3 2 3 2 5 5 2 5 1 – –

Uruguay 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – – –

Uzbekistan 6 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 4 – – – –

Yemen 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – – – – –

Subtotal 557 318 – 1 1 1 2 1 3 10 29 48 91 76 159 92 33 10 – –

State of Palestine 3 1 – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 1 – – – – –

Stateless 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

Total 561 319 – 1 1 1 2 1 3 10 29 49 91 78 160 92 33 10 – –

Annex II

Non-regular staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human

Rights in the Professional and higher categories, by nationality, grade and sex

(As at 31 December 2017)

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-3 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M

Argentina 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – –

Armenia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Australia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Austria 3 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – 2 – –

Bangladesh 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Belarus 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Belgium 4 3 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – 1 2 – – –

Benin 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Brazil 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – –

Bulgaria 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Burundi 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Cameroon 3 2 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 1 – – –

Canada 8 8 – – – – – – – – 1 – – – 6 – 1 – – –

Central African

Republic 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

China 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Colombia 3 3 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – 1 – – –

Côte d’Ivoire 3 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 1 – –

Czechia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Democratic Republic

of the Congo 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Denmark 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – – – – –

Egypt 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Ethiopia 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Finland 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

France 19 14 – – – – – – – – – – 2 1 8 4 4 – – –

Gambia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – – –

Germany 6 4 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 1 1 1 – –

Greece 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – –

Haiti 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Hungary 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

India 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Ireland 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – –

Italy 11 6 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 3 4 3 – – –

Kenya 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – –

Kyrgyzstan 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – –

Lithuania 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Mauritania 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Mauritius 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-3 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M

Mexico 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Nepal 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – –

Netherlands 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Nigeria 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – – –

Norway 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 1 – – –

Philippines 3 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 – – – –

Republic of Korea 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – –

Republic of Moldova 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Romania 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – –

Senegal 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Serbia 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Singapore 2 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – –

Spain 11 7 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 6 3 – – 1 –

Sudan 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Sweden 3 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 1 – – – –

Switzerland 9 6 – – – – – – – – – – 1 – 2 3 3 – – –

Syrian Arab Republic 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Togo 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – –

Turkey 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – – – – –

Uganda 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – –

Ukraine 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

United Kingdom of

Great Britain and

Northern Ireland 8 3 – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 1 3 1 – – –

United States of

America 11 7 – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 6 2 – – – –

Uruguay 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – –

Uzbekistan 2 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – – – –

Venezuela (Bolivarian

Republic of) 2 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 1 – –

Subtotal 169 103 – – – – – – – – 1 – 10 10 58 47 33 9 1 –

State of Palestine 1 1 – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 – – – – –

Total 170 104 1 10 10 59 47 33 9 1